What is scientific Approach of Research? All you need to know by, CraveEduco
Q1. What is scientific Approach of Research?
The scientific approach is generally described as a method of acquiring knowledge in which investigators move inductively from their observations to hypotheses and then deductively from the hypotheses to the logical implications of the hypotheses.
It helps in examining that the hypothesized relationship was valid or following or not. If the implications are related to the organized body or the assumptions of accepted knowledge, researchers then further test them by gathering empirical data. On the basis of the evidence, if related to the assumptions or hypothesis they accept the hypothesis or reject the hypotheses if not related.
This whole process followed some steps -
1. Identification of the problem. The first step is the realization that a problem exists. The problem may involve a question about something, a discrepancy in findings, or a gap in knowledge.
2. Statement of the problem. The next step is the clarification of the problem. The investigator states more precisely the nature and scope of the problem that has been identified.
3. Formulation of hypotheses. The investigator formulates hypotheses about possible solutions to the problem. Hypothesis in a simple way we can understand as an assumption or a prediction of something. In the example, the first hypothesis was that the motorcycle did not start because of trouble in the electrical system. the second hypothesis is the motorcycle is not starting because the tire is punctured. and the third hypothesis was that the motorcycle did not start because petrol is finished.
4. Prediction of consequences. The investigator next predicts the consequences of each hypothesis; that is, what should result if the data support the hypothesis.
5. Testing of hypotheses. The researcher gathers objective data (information about the motorcycle why it is not working?) to evaluate the adequacy of each hypothesis formulated. If the data support the hypothesis, it is accepted as a reasonable explanation. If the data do not support the hypothesis, it is rejected.
Ex- if the third hypothesis was that the motorcycle did not start because petrol is finished.
if your assumption or hypothesis is matching with the information or data you have collected that you have to accept the Third Hypotheses.
if neither of the three Hypothesis is supporting the data then you or the researcher have to reject the three hypotheses and have to investigate or test further to solve the problem.
To get a better understanding, watch the detail explanation done in the video below-
LIKE, SHARE AND SUBSCRIBE to he channel CraveEduo for more update..
The scientific approach is generally described as a method of acquiring knowledge in which investigators move inductively from their observations to hypotheses and then deductively from the hypotheses to the logical implications of the hypotheses.
It helps in examining that the hypothesized relationship was valid or following or not. If the implications are related to the organized body or the assumptions of accepted knowledge, researchers then further test them by gathering empirical data. On the basis of the evidence, if related to the assumptions or hypothesis they accept the hypothesis or reject the hypotheses if not related.
This whole process followed some steps -
1. Identification of the problem. The first step is the realization that a problem exists. The problem may involve a question about something, a discrepancy in findings, or a gap in knowledge.
2. Statement of the problem. The next step is the clarification of the problem. The investigator states more precisely the nature and scope of the problem that has been identified.
3. Formulation of hypotheses. The investigator formulates hypotheses about possible solutions to the problem. Hypothesis in a simple way we can understand as an assumption or a prediction of something. In the example, the first hypothesis was that the motorcycle did not start because of trouble in the electrical system. the second hypothesis is the motorcycle is not starting because the tire is punctured. and the third hypothesis was that the motorcycle did not start because petrol is finished.
4. Prediction of consequences. The investigator next predicts the consequences of each hypothesis; that is, what should result if the data support the hypothesis.
5. Testing of hypotheses. The researcher gathers objective data (information about the motorcycle why it is not working?) to evaluate the adequacy of each hypothesis formulated. If the data support the hypothesis, it is accepted as a reasonable explanation. If the data do not support the hypothesis, it is rejected.
Ex- if the third hypothesis was that the motorcycle did not start because petrol is finished.
if your assumption or hypothesis is matching with the information or data you have collected that you have to accept the Third Hypotheses.
if neither of the three Hypothesis is supporting the data then you or the researcher have to reject the three hypotheses and have to investigate or test further to solve the problem.
To get a better understanding, watch the detail explanation done in the video below-
LIKE, SHARE AND SUBSCRIBE to he channel CraveEduo for more update..
Watch our entire playlist of Research Methodology with a given link
Following us on
Blog
YouTube channel
Facebook Page
Comments
Post a Comment